Response from Ray Smith on CityCycle

A couple of weeks ago we responded to criticism of the CityCycle bike hire scheme with a media release pointing out the value of the scheme. We also wrote to (PDF, 49 kB) Labor Lord Mayoral candidate Ray Smith to seek clarification on his views that had been reported in the media. We received his response (PDF, 541 kB) this week, and the text is below.

What do you think? Who will provide the best outcomes for cycling in Brisbane?

February 18, 2011

Mr Paul French
CBD Bug
GPO Box 2104
BRISBANE QLD 4001

Dear Mr French,

Thank you for your letter dated 11 February 2011 regarding Brisbane City Council’s CityCycle scheme, and for the opportunity for me to clarify my position.

Along with my Labor colleagues in Council, I have always supported a bike hire scheme for our city. However, I have serious concerns about the way the Lord Mayor has implemented the CityCycle scheme.

I believe the scheme has a greater focus on advertising than it does on cycling. My concern is that cycling is used to justify the proliferation of revenue-raising, distracting and sometimes dangerously-placed advertising signage.

I also believe there has not been enough done to create a safe cycling environment in the inner-city areas where the scheme operates. The Lord Mayor has already admitted that accidents between motorists and CityCycle cyclists are “inevitable”, and that is huge concern for me (Courier-Mail, 26 August 2010). CityCycle will only be successful if there are safe, designated bikeways for cyclists to use, but the Lord Mayor made no attempt to do this in the two years leading up to CityCycle’s opening on 1 October 2010.

I also have concerns about helmet use. The Lord Mayor has known since day one that helmets are compulsory for cyclists and after two years he has failed to come up with a solution to the helmet issue.

CityCycle was 12 months overdue and $8 million over budget and throughout the scheme’s implementation, there was also a concerning lack of consultation undertaken.

There is a lot of work still to be done if CityCycle is to become safe and successful and I have pledged to undertake an immediate audit of the scheme to do this, if I am elected as Lord Mayor in 2012.

Regarding the comments recently published by the Courier Mail online, I’m sure you understand that sometimes the media can oversimplify an argument or editorialise comments. The position I have outlined above is a far cry from ‘declaring war&rquo; on CityCycle an this is the position my Council colleagues and I have long-held.

The published quote from me stated, “It is clear from the figures that people aren’t interested in using it and I think right now the priority is taking those funds and instead of rolling out more of the big yellow bikes, the priority is to rebuild Brisbane.”

I stand by these comments because evidence (such as usage numbers) shows the first stage of the scheme is not being fully utilised yet and priority should be given to repairing flood damage in our city. I also believe Council needs to get stage one of the scheme right before they roll out more bike stations and bicycles.

With regard to the comments included in our media release on the Lord Mayor’s Northern Link (now Legacy Way) toll tunnel, I must say:

Since I was endorsed by as Labor’s Lord Mayoral candidate, I have been vocal in my opposition to the construction of another expensive toll tunnel that no one uses, and does not solve traffic congestion.

In the aftermath of the floods, I again called on the Lord Mayor to scrap the project and redirect the $470 million in ratepayers’ funds that has been set aside for the tunnel to urgent flood recovery and long-term flood mitigation works. Northern Link will leave this Council with a huge debt of $2.2 billion and when it opens in 2014/15, the tunnel is forecast to have an average annual operating deficit of $56 million in each of the first five years of full operations (QTC Report, p. 6). As you are aware, this tunnel will limit Council’s ability to fun basic projects and services for years to come.

You may be interested to hear that the Lord Mayor announced $16 million in cuts to bikeway projects yesterday to fund the flood recovery (Nundah Creek, Gateway North, Oxley Creek, Perrin Creek, Kedron Brook).

These cuts would not be necessary if the Lord Mayor hadn’t maxed out the Council credit card with a huge, $2.2 billion debt for the Northern Link tunnel.

I understand you issued a media release ‘condemning’ me for my ‘position’ on both CityCycle and Northern Link and I am pleased to be able to set the record straight. If you are ever concerned about a position I have taken, I urge you to get in touch with me so these types of errors do not occur again.

I would certainly welcome the opportunity to meet with you and other members of CBD BUG. While we may not always agree on every policy position, I am hopeful we can work together and I look forward to meeting with you.

Yours sincerely,

RAY SMITH
Brisbane Lord Mayoral Candidate

For the record, our media release criticised Mr Smith’s position on CityCycle but took a similar position to him on Northern Link (Legacy Way). Any implication of criticism of his position on Northern Link was not intended.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Response from Ray Smith on CityCycle

  1. Jon McLeod says:

    What he says seems reasonable to me. But politicians always “clean up” their policy language when directing a response to a constituent with a clear interest — they’re not nearly so clear when speaking to the generic media.

    Is this guy evil? Or is he one of us? I give up.

  2. Andrew Rasmussen says:

    Here’s the things he actually said he’d do:
    1. an audit,
    2. stop rolling out CityCycle “until stage one is right”.
    A cynical person would say the rest is just fluff.
    I for one am not particularly impressed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>